Initial Results of Hungarian Blonde d'Aquitaine Breeding Bull Candidates in the Vytelle System

Authors

  • Márton Demény Association of Hungarian Limousin and Blonde d’Aquitaine Breeders, Budapest https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0709-1357
  • Tamás Páble Te Mania Angus, 1830 Woolsthorpe-Hexham Rd Hexham VIC 3273, Victoria, Australia
  • Natasa Fazekas Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Szent István Campus Institute of Animal Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1790-9234
  • Márton Révész Dörögdi Mező Ltd., Taliándörögd, Hungary
  • János Tőzsér Albert Kázmér Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences of Széchenyi István University Department of Animal Science, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5632-1765

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17108/ActAgrOvar.2025.66.1.5

Keywords:

Vytille system, comparative feed conversion, daily weight gain, Blonde d'Aquitaine, breeding bull candidates

Abstract

Nowadays, public opinion is determined by economic and environmental considerations, so when selecting beef cattle for breeding, the aim is to achieve the largest possible body size while reducing feed costs and methane emissions. Computer-controlled automatic feeding systems can measure the exact amount of feed consumed by animals, enabling the RFI value to be determined. This value expresses the difference between the amount of feed actually consumed by the animal and the amount expected based on its live weight and body weight gain.
In 2024, we studied 29 Blonde d'Aquitaine breeding bulls that were fed using the Vytille system and housed in two pens in Taliándörögd. The animals were divided into four groups based on their RFI values and average daily weight gain, and their production data were analysed using a multivariate generalised linear model (GLM) method.
Based on our results, it was not necessary to take pen effect into account, as the husbandry technology was perfectly suited to the purpose. The four groups were sufficient for selection based on feed conversion and daily weight gain. Taking all the measured values into account, the young bulls in the group with favourable RFI and above-average daily weight gain are the most promising.

References

Alende, M., Lancaster, P. A., Spangler, M. L., Prodomingo, A. J., & Andrae, J. G. (2016). Residual feed intake in cattle: Physiological basis. Revista Argentina de Produccion Animal 36(2), 49-56.

Arthur, P. F., Renand, G., & Krauss, D. (2001). Genetic parameters for growth and feed efficiency in weaner versus yearling Charolais bulls. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52(4), 471-476. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR00070

Arthur, P. F., & Herd, R. M. (2008). Residual feed intake in beef cattle. Revista Brasilieira de Zootecnica, 37 (spe), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001300031

Basarab, J., Crews, D., Moore, S. S., Ramsey, P., French, N., & McKinnon, S. (2006). Residual feed intake (net feed efficiency) in beef cattle. Agri-Facts: Practical Information for Alberta’s Agriculture Industry, 420(11), 1-4.

Bezzera, L. R., Sarmento, J. L. R., Neto, S. G., Oliveira de Paula, R. N., Oliveira, L. R., & Fontes do Rêgo, W. M. (2013). Residual feed intake: A nutritional tool for genetic improvement. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45, 1649-1661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0435-y

Bormann, M., & Rolf, M. M. (2022). Relationships between enteric methane production and economically important traits in beef cattle. Livestock Science, 265, 105102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105102

Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G., Nedelkov, K., Crosson, P., & McGee, M. (2024). Some plasma biomarkers of residual feed intake in beef cattle remain consistent regardless of intake level. Scientific Reports, 14, 8540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59253-7

Elolimy, A. A., Abdelmegeid, M. K., McCann, J. C., Shike, D. W., & Loor, J. J. (2018). Residual feed intake in beef cattle and its association with carcass traits, ruminal solid‐fraction bacteria, and epithelium gene expression. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 9(67), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0283-8

Golden, J. W., Kerley, M. S., & Kolath, W. H. (2008). The relationship of feeding behavior to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no‐roughage diets. Journal of Animal Science, 86(1), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-569

Hafla, A., Lancaster, G., Carstens, D., Forrest, J., Fox, T., Forbes, M. D. R., Randel, J., & Holloway, J. (2012). Relationships between feed efficiency, scrotal circumference, and semen quality traits in yearling bulls. Journal of Animal Science, 90(11), 3937-3944. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4029

Herd, R. M., Oddy, V. H., & Richardson, E. C. (2004). Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle 1: Review of potential mechanisms. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 44(5), 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA02220

Holló, G., Nagy-Kiszlinger, H., Tossenberger, J., Török, M., & Húth, B. (2022). Individual Feed Efficiency Monitoring of Charolaise Candidate Young Bulls in Relation to Feeding Behavior and Self-Performance Test Results. Animals, 12(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010035

Kerley, M. S. (2010). Impact of selection for residual feed intake on forage intake by beef cows and feed efficiency of progeny (pp. 39-49). University of Missouri, Division of Animal Sciences. https://animal.ifas.ufl.edu/apps/dairymedia/rns/2010/4-Kerley.pdf

Lakamp, A. D., Weaber, L. R., Bormann, J. M., & Rolf, M. M. (2022). Relationships between enteric methane production and economically important traits in beef cattle. Livestock Science, 265, 105102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105102

Marín, M. F., Naya, H., Espasandin, A. C., Navajas, E., Devincenzi, T., & Carriquiry, M. (2024). Energy efficiency of grazing Hereford heifers classified by paternal residual feed intake. Translational Animal Science, 8, txae005. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae005

McKenna, C., Porter, R. K., Keogh, K. A., Waters, S. M., McGee, M., & Kenny, D. A. (2018). Residual feed intake phenotype and gender affect the expression of key genes of the lipogenesis pathway in subcutaneous adipose tissue of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 9(68). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0282-9

Meyer, A. M., Kerley, M. S., & Kallenbach, R. L. (2008). The effect of residual feed intake classification on forage intake by grazing beef cows. Journal of Animal Science, 86(10), 2670-2679. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0642

Minton, N. O. (2010). Improvement of feed efficiency in beef cattle through selection upon residual feed intake (RFI) [Master’s thesis, University of Missouri–Columbia]. https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/10520

Sainz, R. D., & Paulino, P. V. (2004). Residual feed intake. Sierra Foothill Research and Extension Center, UC Davis. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9w93f7ks

Silva, C. S. d., Leao, J. M., Lage, C. F. A., Coelho, S. G., & Campos, M. M. (2023). Residual feed intake as an efficiency metric for pre‐weaning dairy calves: What do we know? Life, 13(8), 1727. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081727

Richardson, E. C., & Herd, R. M. (2004). Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. Part 2: Synthesis of results following divergent selection. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 44(5), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA02221

Downloads

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

Demény, M., Páble, T., Fazekas, N., Révész, M., & Tőzsér, J. (2025). Initial Results of Hungarian Blonde d’Aquitaine Breeding Bull Candidates in the Vytelle System. Acta Agronomica Óváriensis, 66(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.17108/ActAgrOvar.2025.66.1.5

Issue

Section

Scientific paper