Beküldések

Bejelentkezés vagy Regisztráció a beküldéshez.

Ellenőrzőlista a benyújtás előkészítéséhez

A benyújtási folyamat része, hogy a szerzők ellenőrizzék le a benyújtandó anyaguk mindenben megfelel az alábbi listában szereplő elvárásoknak, és azokat a beadványokat, amelyek nem tartják be a az útmutatóban leírtakat, azokat vissza lehet küldeni a szerzőnek.
  • A beküldött anyag nem lett korábban publikálva, és megelőzően egy másik folyóiratnál sem lett lektorálva (bővebb magyarázatot lásd a Megjegyzések a szerkesztőnek résznél).
  • A beküldési állománya OpenOffice, Microsoft Word vagy RTF document fájlformátumban van.
  • Ahol rendelkezésre állt, a hivatkozásokhoz az URL megadásra kerültek.
  • A szöveg szimpla sorköz szerkezetű, 12-es betűméretet használ. Dölt szövegezést használ aláhúzás helyett (kívétel az URL címek), és az összes illusztráció, ábra és táblázat a szövegtörzs megfelelő szakaszában található és nem a dokumentum végén.
  • A szöveg betartja, és megfelel a Szerzői Útmutatóban felvázolt stílus- és bibliográfiai követelményeknek.

Szerzői útmutatók

TÁJÉKOZTATÓ ÉS ÚTMUTATÓ A SZERZŐK RÉSZÉRE

GUIDELINES AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE AUTHORS

General guidelines

  1. Only original research articles or reviews dealing with plant sciences (horticulture, genetics, plant pathology, pests, agro meteorology, plant physiology, agro-botany, etc.), animal sciences (domestic and wild animals, feed sciences, animal genetics, animal physiology, etc.), agricultural engineering (mechanisation, precision farming, green energy, etc.), environmental sciences, food sciences, agricultural economics, rural development and not published elsewhere before can be published in the journal.
  2. Articles written in English or in Hungarian can be published in our journal, depending whether the given new scientific results would evoke national or international interest more. English materials are favoured when making up the new issue.
  3. Only manuscripts totally in concordance with the formal requirements listed below are accepted.
  4. Please, upload your manuscript – together with the supporting materials – on the following surface: https://aao.ddc.sze.hu and send it to tozser.janos@sze.hu as well.

Editing the manuscripts

  1. Formal requirements

1.1. Please, prepare your manuscript with Microsoft Word or an entirely compatible text editing software, with Acta manuscript template.

Open page

Manuscript template

Manuscripts must contain at least 4000, but not more than 10000 words, together with tables and figures, written with Calibri letter type 12 pt. letter size, leaving 2 cm margins on both sides. (In case of short communications number of words can’t exceed 3500.) Use black letters on one side of office (A4) papers, with simple line spacing. Please, avoid using headers and footers.

1.2. Chapter and subchapter headings and other separate sections should be separated from the
preceding text as indicated in the manuscript template.

1.3. Known foreign words have to be written as pronounced, in case of those not in common use yet please, use the original spelling.

Next to the English or Hungarian names of species the scientific one also has to be indicated with italics (in special cases even in the title). Breed names have to be indicated according to what accepted in the classification/ breed standard, also with italics (e.g.: Sinapis alba cv. Budakalász sárga).

  1. Structure of the manuscript

2.1. Name of the author(s), their ORCiD identifiers, their affiliation(s) along with the location of the institution(s) have to be indicated under the title. Please, avoid giving full addresses. We’re not publishing the academic degrees and assignments of the authors. Use (*) for indicating the corresponding author, and please, provide his/her e-mail address.

2.2. According to the general system of scientific works and the traditions of Acta Agronomica Óváriensis manuscripts have to be structured to the chapters bellow:

  • Abstract (with keywords)
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
  • Materials and methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • References

Some of the chapters can be merges in concordance the nature of length of the topic:

Introduction and Literature review, Results and Discussion. Instead of Materials and methods subtitle Presenting the experiments can also be used.

In case of review articles the following sectioning is advised:

  • Abstract
  • Presenting and interpreting the national and international literature
  • Discussion
  • References

2.3. The Abstract must be at least 150, but no more than 250 words, and providing 3-5 keywords is obligatory. Please, structure your abstract according to the following aspects: describing the question, it’s importance, showing the conceptions, experimental design, results, and discussion.

2.4. Those supporting materials have to be provided next to the manuscripts, in separate pages:

  • an English language abstract with the English title, the name of author(s) and their affiliations, English keywords in case of Hungarian manuscripts;
  • a Hungarian language abstract with the Hungarian title, the name of author(s) and their affiliations, Hungarian keywords in case of English manuscripts. (That is made by the Board of Editors in case of international authors.)
  1. References

3.1. APA 7th Style citations (https://apastyle.apa.org) has to be applied within the text and in References. Aids:

Common Reference Examples Guide

APA 7ht Quick guide

3.2. References have to follow ABC order and based on date of being published. Please, list every title in a new row. In case of references with a DOI number that have to be also indicated!

  1. Figures and tables

4.1.      Please, use Calibri font type in case of tables as well. If possible, do not use differently weighted lines and frames in the tables, as it is specified in the template.

4.2.      Same datasets are published only in table or in figures, but not both together. Please, always refer to the tables and figures within the text (with italics).

  1. Proofreading, reviewers

5.1. Scientific reviewers are assigned by the Editors anonymously. Authors and reviewers cannot know each other during the process (see in the flowchart).

5.2. Opinion of the reviewers (together with the corrected manuscripts) will be provided to the authors in OJS file handling system. Authors are kindly asked to upload their corrected manuscripts there as soon as possible, but not later than 2 weeks after the reviewers’ opinions are received.

5.3. Authors are encouraged, but not required, to review previously published articles in this journal that are topically relevant to their manuscript, and to cite them only where scientifically justified.

6. Artificial Intelligence (AI) use policy

The Acta Agronomica Óváriensis permits the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI tools in the preparation of manuscripts, provided that their use is transparent and does not compromise research integrity.

6.1.Use by Authors: Authors must disclose the use of generative AI or AI-assisted tools that materially contribute to the preparation of a manuscript, including the generation or substantial editing of text, data analysis, coding, or the generation or modification of images, tables, or other research outputs. The disclosure should identify the tool or model used and briefly describe its purpose. Where relevant and available, the version or model should also be specified.

AI-generated or AI-assisted content must be critically evaluated and verified by the authors. Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, integrity, originality, and appropriate attribution of all content submitted for publication, including content produced or modified with the assistance of AI. AI tools must not be listed as authors or co-authors.

Routine use of AI-based spelling, grammar, or language-editing tools that do not generate or substantially alter the intellectual content of the manuscript does not normally require a separate declaration.

6.2. Use by Reviewers and Editors: Reviewers and editors must maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and must not upload manuscripts, reviewer reports, or other confidential material to publicly available or third-party AI systems. AI tools may be used in editorial or peer-review processes only where confidentiality, data protection, and the integrity of the review process can be adequately ensured. Compliance with these requirements must be ensured and, where requested, demonstrated to the journal.

 

Only articles in concordances with above rules, and without mistakes can be edited. Manuscripts not fulfilling those requirements have to be rejected. Editors keep the right to alter the manuscripts in length and in quality.

Honorarium is not provided for the articles.

Manuscripts are saved until final articles are published.

Board of Editors

Szerkesztőségi közlemény

A Szerkesztőség szakembereinek adott szakmai témával kapcsolatos összegző és elemző véleménye.

Adatvédelmi nyilatkozat

A folyóiratnál megadott nevek és email címek kizárólag a folyóiratnál ismertetett céllal lesznek felhasználva. Egyéb célokra, harmadik félnek nem kerülnek átadásra.